How we got stranded in a spending ratchet

Simon Cowan

If we were digging for a certain spin on a broader mercantile devise in the budget, a best we could contend is that a supervision is committed to achieving a surplus. The Treasurer claimed they had “exhausted each event to secure savings” from prior budgets, so in his “fair and obliged trail behind to a offset budget” taxation increases have been drafted in to do a complicated lifting.

There are a series of problems with this, though there are dual essential ones: historically taxation rises have not compelled spending increases; and it undermines a destiny wealth required to make a devise work in a initial place.

For a past 40 years, supervision spending and taxation in Australia has followed a specific pattern.

Across all 3 levels of government, spending rises fast when mercantile conditions are poor. There are noted increases during a early to mid-1970s, a early 80s and 90s, a late 90s around a Asian financial predicament and a dotcom crash, and a late 2000s reflecting a Global Financial Crisis.

Posted in
Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
short link