Forza Horizon 4 Benchmarked

Racing pretension Forza Horizon 4 is nearing to digital store shelves this week worldwide (October 2) and to work out what kind of GPU energy you’ll need to suffer it we’ve tested about 50 graphics cards, so we have a large GPU benchmark incoming.

Forza Horizon 4 is an open universe racing video diversion grown by Playground Games and published by Microsoft Studios. The diversion facilities over 450 protected cars and is set in a fictionalised illustration of a United Kingdom. As a name suggests it’s a fourth Forza Horizon title, though also a eleventh installment in a Forza series.

Two years ago we skipped over contrast Forza Horizon 3 due to terrible opening on PC, and that wasn’t a suitable condition for testing. The conditions with Forza Horizon 4 couldn’t be some-more different. The diversion is unequivocally good optimized, generally on complicated hardware and to contend that it’s visually monumental would be an understatement.

For contrast we used a game’s built-in benchmark. Normally we equivocate canned benchmarks though a chronicle supposing here is unequivocally good and does a good pursuit of representing tangible gameplay. We used a ‘Ultra’ peculiarity preset during 1080p, 1440p and 4K resolutions. Then as a reward we’ve re-tested some of a stream and prior era mid-range GPUs along with some comparison models with a middle peculiarity preset during 1080p.

Along with a ton of opposite graphics cards, a exam supply is comprised of a Core i7-8700K clocked during 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3400 memory. For a Radeon GPUs we’re regulating Adrenalin Edition 18.9.3 and for a GeForce GPUs motorist chronicle 411.70.


First adult let’s take a tighten demeanour during a 1080p results. Things demeanour flattering normal here, a GTX 980 looks a small lackluster, removing beaten by flattering many all a mid-range AMD offerings such as a R9 Nano and 390.

When looking during a some-more complicated GPUs for 60 fps on average, all gamers need is a GTX 1060 6GB or RX 580, both delivered well-developed opening during 1080p, gripping support rates above 60 fps during all times.

Something engaging here was how many reduce a RX 560 2GB was than a 4GB model, fundamentally delivering RX 550-like performance. The 2GB GTX 1050 was also utterly a bit slower than a 3GB model. Then during a bottom of a graph we find a GT 1030 in both a GDDR5 and DDR4 variants. Both behaving some-more badly common in this title.

The Fury X comes in usually behind a GTX 980 Ti while a R9 380 usually kick a GTX 960. For 60 fps on normal you’ll need a GTX 980 or improved though for a smallest of 60 fps you’ll need a Fury X or GTX 980 Ti, so that’s a high sequence during usually 1080p.

Something else you’ve no doubt beheld is how good a AMD GPUs perform in this title, Vega 64 Liquid for instance is still relating a RTX 2080, creation it noticeably faster than a GTX 1080 Ti. Vega 56 also dejected a GTX 1080 and wasn’t many slower than a GTX 1080 Ti. We see this opposite a board, a RX 570 crushed a 3GB GTX 1060 as another example, charity a large 21% opening boost.

Moving adult to 1440p we’ve forsaken a series of a entrance turn GPUs as they were simply too slow. As we can see a GTX 960 and R9 380 are equivocal playable, depending on your standards. Anything slower than a GTX 970 is unequivocally struggling here and brief of a unequivocally fastest prior era cards we will notice unchanging slowdowns.

Again we see a graphics cards with usually 2GB of VRAM unequivocally struggling. For around 60 fps on normal a GTX 1060 6GB or RX 580 will again be required, while a GTX 1070, 1070 Ti, 1080 or Vega 56 will be indispensable in sequence to keep support rates above 60fps.

The Radeon GPUs keep drill a GeForce foe here, generally Vega 56 given it creates clarity in terms of cost vs. performance. Vega 64 Liquid looks impressive, though law be told given a cost it should always compare a GTX 1080 Ti.

Interestingly a 2080 Ti was usually 12% faster than a 2080 and reduction than 20% faster than Vega 64 Liquid and a GTX 1080 Ti. So a flattering diseased display here for a new RTX graphics cards in terms of cost vs performance.

As we competence have approaching 4K performance, during slightest with a ultra peculiarity settings is off a list for a GTX 980 Ti and Fury X. Overall not good opening from these comparison generations though we was dumbfounded to find a GTX 1070 delivering over 50 fps on normal with a 1% low of 46fps.

AMD’s Vega GPUs do tumble divided a small during a 4K fortitude though even so we see Vega 56 relating a GTX 1080, so still an considerable outcome for a red team. Vega 64 Liquid was means to pull over 60 fps during all times and we saw a same from a GTX 1080 Ti, RTX 2080 and, of course, a RTX 2080 Ti. As common a RTX 2080 Ti was implausible during 4K pulling adult to 100 fps on average. Still that meant it was usually 20% faster than a GTX

To finish off contrast we’ve tested roughly 30 GPUs regulating a Medium peculiarity preset with MSAA infirm in preference of FXAA. This wasn’t a discerning exercise, you’re looking during around 8 hours of work usually to emanate this graph. The diversion has to be totally reset when changing peculiarity presets and roughly each time it crashes on a reset, though I’ll hold on this some-more in a moment.

Depending on a GPU you’re looking during anywhere from a 20 to 40% opening uplift when downgrading from a ultra to a middle peculiarity preset. The RX 570 for instance saw a 20% opening boost while a GTX 1050 saw a 30% boost and a RX 550 a 40% boost.

The middle peculiarity preset authorised a GTX 960 and R9 380 to normal around 60 fps and enabled playable opening for many of a comparison mid-range GPUs. Finally a GTX 780 and 780 Ti for whatever reason sealed adult when loading a benchmark, we attempted many workarounds, all failed.

Closing Remarks

We wish that serves we as a beam for those of we wanting to know how good Forza Horizon 4 will run on your PC. Frankly we’re super tender with how good optimized this pretension is, quite for complicated hardware. The diversion runs unequivocally good on comparison GPUs, though for a complicated things a turn of optimization is incredible.

We never approaching to find a diversion that looks this good and is absolutely playable during 4K regulating a GTX 1070, and we certain as ruin never suspicion we’d see over 60 fps regulating Vega 56. In fact, Vega 56 was a star of a show, charity GTX 1080 opening or improved for reduction money. If usually opening looked like this in all games…

AMD dominated a lower-end battles as well, with a RX 580 and 570 totally cleaning up. It’s unequivocally engaging that one of a best looking many optimized titles we’ve ever seen, shows off Radeon GPUs in such a certain light.

We were propitious to be means to play and exam a diversion forward of release, and while it does demeanour extraordinary and plays unequivocally well, it’s not accurately bug free. we usually ran into a few in-game crashes when testing, a biggest emanate was seen when usually perplexing to get into a game. For me a diversion crashed approach too mostly when starting adult or when changing peculiarity settings.

Expect some early patch to repair this. It was positively annoying, though thankfully for a many partial once we get in, Forza Horizon 4 runs like a dream. You still have to contend with a disgustingly bad Windows Store and a fact that it appears unfit to behind adult a 60GB diversion install, though what can we do?

Shopping Shortcuts:

Posted in
Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
short link